Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Bibliometric Analysis of the Management Concept of Phenomenology Using Visual Mapping Technique

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 472 - 490, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.47097/piar.1270484

Öz

The field of management science is centred around individuals and encompasses various aspects that cannot be statistically analysed, similar to those encountered in human existence. In this regard, the concept of phenomenology guides perceptual interpretation in the field of management. Phenomenology is a philosophy, a research paradigm, a methodology, and it is synonymous with qualitative research. The research's goal is to contribute to the relevant literature by analysing the content of scientific publications made in the field of management as a philosophical concept. To that end, 398 scientific publications on phenomenology from the Web of Science database were examined using the bibliometric analysis method, and the results were visualised using the VOSviewer software programme. On scientific publications, bibliometric techniques such as citation analysis, keyword analysis, and co-author citation analysis were utilised. The evolution of the literature on the concept of phenomenology in the field of management is mapped using bibliometric techniques, providing a comprehensive view of the field's dynamics, and identifying important studies, countries, and authors. The findings of the analysis are expected to serve as a foundation for future studies on phenomenology in the field of management.

Kaynakça

  • Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (5), 957-983.
  • Al, U. (2008). Türkiye’nin bilimsel yayın politikası: Atıf dizinlerine dayalı bibliyometrik bir yaklaşım (Doktora Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Albort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Leal-Milla´n, A., & Cepeda-Carrion, G. (2017). Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of green innovation. Sustainability, 9 (6), 1011.
  • Anosike, P., Ehrich, L. C., & Ahmed, P. (2012). Phenomenology as a method for exploring management practice. International Journal of Management Practice, 5 (3), 205-224.
  • Archambault, E., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivie`re, V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the web of science and scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, ASIS, 60 (7), 1320-1326.
  • Block J, Fisch C, Rehan F. (2019). Religion and entrepreneurship: a map of the feld and a bibliometric analysis. Manag Rev Quarter (Published online: 21 December 2019).
  • Borner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K.W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 37 (1), 179-255.
  • Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2 (2), 1-40.
  • Chen, C., Dubin, R., & Schultz, T. (2014). Science mapping. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Edt.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (3rd Edition), Hershey PA, USA: IGI Global, 4171-4184.
  • Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient atterns in scientific literatüre. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (3), 359-377.
  • Cobo, M.J., Lopez-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, 5 (1), 146-166.
  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., & Herrera-Viedma E. (2015). A Relational Database Model for Science Mapping Analysis. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 12 (6), 43- 62.
  • Coşkun, H. E., & Tabak, A. (2016). 1995-2015 Yılları Arasında Örgütsel Davranış ve İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Alanında Dünya Ne Çalıştı, Biz Ne Çalıştık? Sorusunun İzini Sürmek. 4. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi (s. 290-299). Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dökümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı.
  • Cote, J.A.J.A., Leong, S.M., & Cote, J.A.J.A. (1991). Assessing the influence of journal of consumer research: a citation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (3), 402-410.
  • De Bakker, F.G., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44 (3), 283–317.
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
  • Ehrich, L. (2005). Revisiting phenomenology: Its potential for management research. Challenges of organisations in global markets: BAM2005, 1-13.
  • Eren, I. (2008). Phenomenology: Edmund Husserl, Max Scheler. Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 0 (11), 103-120.
  • Fetscherin, M., & Heinrich, D. (2015). Consumer brand relationships research: a bibliometric citation meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 68 (2), 380-390.
  • Gibson, S.K., & Hanes, L.A. (2003). The contribution of phenomenology to HRD research. Human Resource Development Review, 2 (2), 181-205.
  • Giorgi, A. (1985). Phenomenological psychology of learning and verbal tradition. In Giorgi, A. (Ed): Phenomenology and Psychological Research, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 3-21.
  • Giorgi, A. (1992). Description versus interpretation: competing alternative strategies for qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 23 (2), 119-135.
  • Goldstein, L. J. (1963). The phenomenological and naturalistic approaches to the social. In M. A. Natanson, ed. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, New York Random House, 286-301.
  • Hartmann, N. (1946). Almanya'da Yeni Ontoloji Cereyanı. Felsefe Arkivi, 1 (2-3), 202-254.
  • Hallinger, P., Lee, T. H. T., & Szeto, E. (2013). Review of research on educational leadership and management in Hong Kong, 1995-2012: Topographical analysis of an emergent knowledge base. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12, 256-281.
  • Hatch, M. J., & Yanow, D. (2005). Organization Theory as an Interpretive Science. In H. Tsoukas ve C. Knudsden, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory: Meta-Theoretical Perspevtives, London: Oxford University Press.
  • Heidegger, M. (1988). The basic problems of phenomenology. Indiana University Press.
  • Holt, R., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Phenomenology and organization theory. In Philosophy and organization theory, 32, 215-249, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Husserl, E. (1995). Kesin Bir Bilim Olarak Felsefe. Yapı Kredi Yayınları. Çev. Mengüşoğlu, T.
  • Kallens P., & Yoshimi, J. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of the Phenomenology Literatüre. In Horizons of Phenomenology, P. Londen, P. Walsh, ve J. Yoshimi, Eds., Springer.
  • Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14 (1), 10-25.
  • Küpers, W., & Weibler, J. (2005). Emotionen in organisationen. Kohlhammer.
  • Law, R., & Cheung, P. (2008). An analysis of publications in leading tourism journals and ıts ımplications. Journal of China Tourism Research, 4 (1), 78–97.
  • Marin, G. M., Merigo, J. M., & Popa, S. (2018). Twenty years of the Journal of Knowledge Management: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management.
  • McAuley, J., Duberley, J., & Johnson, P. (2007). Organization Theory: Challenges and Perspectives. London: FT Prentice Hall.
  • McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (6), 433–443.
  • Mengüşoğlu, T. (1945). Fenomenoloji felsefesi. Felsefe Arkivi, 1(1).
  • Merigo, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37-48.
  • Nederhof, A.J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: a review. Scientometrics, 66 (1), 81-100.
  • Öktem, Ü. (2005). Fenomenoloji ve Edmund Husserl'de apaçıklık evidenz problemi. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 45 (1), 27-55.
  • Persson, O., Danell, R., & Schneider, J.W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In A˚ strom, F., Danell, R., Larsen, B. ve Schneider, J. (Eds), Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at His 60th Birthday, International Society for Scientometrics and Infometrics, Leuven, 9-24.
  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25, 348.
  • Rehn, C., Gornitzki, C., Larsson, A., & Wadskog, D. (2014). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. Karolinska Institutet University Library Publications. https://kib.ki.se/sites/default/files/bibliometric_handbook_2014.pdf.
  • Saunders, S. (2007). Quantum Theory, and Reality. Oxford UniversityPress.
  • Sevimli, H. (2022). Fenomenoloji kitabı üzerine bir inceleme. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12 (2), 68-73.
  • Shah, S. H. H., Lei, S., Ali, M., Doronin, D., & Hussain, S. T. (2020). Prosumption: bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes, 49 (3), 1020-1045.
  • Schrag, O. C. (2006). Heidegger’in felsefesinde varlıkbilim ve tarih. (Çev. Şen, S.). Çağdaş Türkiye Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13, 205- 215.
  • Sharifi, A., Simangan, D., & Kaneko, S. (2021). Three decades of research on climate change and peace: A bibliometrics analysis. Sustainability Science, 16, 1079-1095.
  • Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (4), 265-269.
  • Şengöz, M. (2020). What is science? Is business administration a science? Academic Knowledge, 3 (2), 122-133.
  • Ukşul, Ş. (2016). Türkiye’de eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme alanında yapılmış bilimsel yayınların sosyal ağ analizi ile değerlendirilmesi: Bir bibliyometrik çalışma (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Akdeniz Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Antalya.
  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523-538.
  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). CitNetExplorer: a New Software Tool for Analyzing and Visualizing Citation Networks. Journal of Informetrics, 8 (4), 802-823.
  • Waugh Jr, W. L., & Waugh, W. W. (2006). Phenomenology and Public Administration. In Lynch, T. D. ed., Handbook of Organizational Theory and Management: The Philosophical Approach, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 487-507.
  • Zan, B. U. (2019). Doğrudan atıf, ortak atıf ve bibliyografik eşleşme yaklaşımlarına dayalı olarak araştırma alanlarının değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14 (2), 501-516.
  • Zhao, L., Deng, J., Sun, P., Liu, J., Ji, Y., Nakada, & Yang, Y. (2018). Nanomaterials for treating emerging contaminants in water by adsorption and photocatalysis: Systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 627, 1253-1263.
  • Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18 (3), 429-472.

Yönetim Alanında Fenomenoloji Kavramının Görsel Haritalama Tekniğiyle Bibliyometrik Analizi

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 472 - 490, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.47097/piar.1270484

Öz

Yönetim bilimi, insan odaklıdır ve yönetim alanını içeren birçok konu tıpkı insan hayatında olduğu gibi istatistiksel olarak irdelenemeyen oluşumları barındırır. Bu doğrultuda fenomenoloji kavramı yönetim alanında algısal bakış açısıyla anlamlandırmaya rehberlik eder. Fenomenoloji, bir felsefe, bir araştırma paradigması, bir metodoloji olarak tanımlanmış ve nitel araştırma ile eş tutulmuş bir terimdir. Araştırmanın amacı, fenomenolojiyi felsefi bir kavram olarak yönetim alanında yapılmış çalışmalar odağında yapılan bilimsel yayınların içerik analizini yaparak ilgili literatüre katkı sağlamaktır. Bu doğrultuda, araştırmada öncelikle Web of Science veri tabanı kullanılarak fenomenoloji konusunda yapılan 398 bilimsel yayın bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile irdelenmiş, ardından elde edilen veriler VOSviewer yazılım programı kullanılarak görselleştirilmiştir. Bilimsel yayınlar üzerinde atıf analizi, anahtar kelime, ortak yazar atıf analizi gibi bibliyometrik yöntemler kullanılmıştır. Bibliyometrik yöntemleri kullanarak, alanın dinamiklerine ilişkin kapsamlı bir görüş sunarak ve temel çalışmaları, ülkeleri, dergileri ve yazarları belirleyerek yönetim alanında fenomenoloji kavramına ilişkin literatürün gelişimi haritalandırılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda ulaşılan bulguların yönetim alanında fenomenoloji konusunda gelecekteki çalışmalara kaynak sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (5), 957-983.
  • Al, U. (2008). Türkiye’nin bilimsel yayın politikası: Atıf dizinlerine dayalı bibliyometrik bir yaklaşım (Doktora Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Albort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Leal-Milla´n, A., & Cepeda-Carrion, G. (2017). Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of green innovation. Sustainability, 9 (6), 1011.
  • Anosike, P., Ehrich, L. C., & Ahmed, P. (2012). Phenomenology as a method for exploring management practice. International Journal of Management Practice, 5 (3), 205-224.
  • Archambault, E., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivie`re, V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the web of science and scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, ASIS, 60 (7), 1320-1326.
  • Block J, Fisch C, Rehan F. (2019). Religion and entrepreneurship: a map of the feld and a bibliometric analysis. Manag Rev Quarter (Published online: 21 December 2019).
  • Borner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K.W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 37 (1), 179-255.
  • Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2 (2), 1-40.
  • Chen, C., Dubin, R., & Schultz, T. (2014). Science mapping. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Edt.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (3rd Edition), Hershey PA, USA: IGI Global, 4171-4184.
  • Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient atterns in scientific literatüre. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (3), 359-377.
  • Cobo, M.J., Lopez-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, 5 (1), 146-166.
  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., & Herrera-Viedma E. (2015). A Relational Database Model for Science Mapping Analysis. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 12 (6), 43- 62.
  • Coşkun, H. E., & Tabak, A. (2016). 1995-2015 Yılları Arasında Örgütsel Davranış ve İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Alanında Dünya Ne Çalıştı, Biz Ne Çalıştık? Sorusunun İzini Sürmek. 4. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi (s. 290-299). Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dökümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı.
  • Cote, J.A.J.A., Leong, S.M., & Cote, J.A.J.A. (1991). Assessing the influence of journal of consumer research: a citation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (3), 402-410.
  • De Bakker, F.G., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44 (3), 283–317.
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
  • Ehrich, L. (2005). Revisiting phenomenology: Its potential for management research. Challenges of organisations in global markets: BAM2005, 1-13.
  • Eren, I. (2008). Phenomenology: Edmund Husserl, Max Scheler. Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 0 (11), 103-120.
  • Fetscherin, M., & Heinrich, D. (2015). Consumer brand relationships research: a bibliometric citation meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 68 (2), 380-390.
  • Gibson, S.K., & Hanes, L.A. (2003). The contribution of phenomenology to HRD research. Human Resource Development Review, 2 (2), 181-205.
  • Giorgi, A. (1985). Phenomenological psychology of learning and verbal tradition. In Giorgi, A. (Ed): Phenomenology and Psychological Research, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 3-21.
  • Giorgi, A. (1992). Description versus interpretation: competing alternative strategies for qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 23 (2), 119-135.
  • Goldstein, L. J. (1963). The phenomenological and naturalistic approaches to the social. In M. A. Natanson, ed. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, New York Random House, 286-301.
  • Hartmann, N. (1946). Almanya'da Yeni Ontoloji Cereyanı. Felsefe Arkivi, 1 (2-3), 202-254.
  • Hallinger, P., Lee, T. H. T., & Szeto, E. (2013). Review of research on educational leadership and management in Hong Kong, 1995-2012: Topographical analysis of an emergent knowledge base. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12, 256-281.
  • Hatch, M. J., & Yanow, D. (2005). Organization Theory as an Interpretive Science. In H. Tsoukas ve C. Knudsden, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory: Meta-Theoretical Perspevtives, London: Oxford University Press.
  • Heidegger, M. (1988). The basic problems of phenomenology. Indiana University Press.
  • Holt, R., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Phenomenology and organization theory. In Philosophy and organization theory, 32, 215-249, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Husserl, E. (1995). Kesin Bir Bilim Olarak Felsefe. Yapı Kredi Yayınları. Çev. Mengüşoğlu, T.
  • Kallens P., & Yoshimi, J. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of the Phenomenology Literatüre. In Horizons of Phenomenology, P. Londen, P. Walsh, ve J. Yoshimi, Eds., Springer.
  • Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14 (1), 10-25.
  • Küpers, W., & Weibler, J. (2005). Emotionen in organisationen. Kohlhammer.
  • Law, R., & Cheung, P. (2008). An analysis of publications in leading tourism journals and ıts ımplications. Journal of China Tourism Research, 4 (1), 78–97.
  • Marin, G. M., Merigo, J. M., & Popa, S. (2018). Twenty years of the Journal of Knowledge Management: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management.
  • McAuley, J., Duberley, J., & Johnson, P. (2007). Organization Theory: Challenges and Perspectives. London: FT Prentice Hall.
  • McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (6), 433–443.
  • Mengüşoğlu, T. (1945). Fenomenoloji felsefesi. Felsefe Arkivi, 1(1).
  • Merigo, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37-48.
  • Nederhof, A.J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: a review. Scientometrics, 66 (1), 81-100.
  • Öktem, Ü. (2005). Fenomenoloji ve Edmund Husserl'de apaçıklık evidenz problemi. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 45 (1), 27-55.
  • Persson, O., Danell, R., & Schneider, J.W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In A˚ strom, F., Danell, R., Larsen, B. ve Schneider, J. (Eds), Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at His 60th Birthday, International Society for Scientometrics and Infometrics, Leuven, 9-24.
  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25, 348.
  • Rehn, C., Gornitzki, C., Larsson, A., & Wadskog, D. (2014). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. Karolinska Institutet University Library Publications. https://kib.ki.se/sites/default/files/bibliometric_handbook_2014.pdf.
  • Saunders, S. (2007). Quantum Theory, and Reality. Oxford UniversityPress.
  • Sevimli, H. (2022). Fenomenoloji kitabı üzerine bir inceleme. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12 (2), 68-73.
  • Shah, S. H. H., Lei, S., Ali, M., Doronin, D., & Hussain, S. T. (2020). Prosumption: bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes, 49 (3), 1020-1045.
  • Schrag, O. C. (2006). Heidegger’in felsefesinde varlıkbilim ve tarih. (Çev. Şen, S.). Çağdaş Türkiye Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13, 205- 215.
  • Sharifi, A., Simangan, D., & Kaneko, S. (2021). Three decades of research on climate change and peace: A bibliometrics analysis. Sustainability Science, 16, 1079-1095.
  • Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (4), 265-269.
  • Şengöz, M. (2020). What is science? Is business administration a science? Academic Knowledge, 3 (2), 122-133.
  • Ukşul, Ş. (2016). Türkiye’de eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme alanında yapılmış bilimsel yayınların sosyal ağ analizi ile değerlendirilmesi: Bir bibliyometrik çalışma (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Akdeniz Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Antalya.
  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523-538.
  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). CitNetExplorer: a New Software Tool for Analyzing and Visualizing Citation Networks. Journal of Informetrics, 8 (4), 802-823.
  • Waugh Jr, W. L., & Waugh, W. W. (2006). Phenomenology and Public Administration. In Lynch, T. D. ed., Handbook of Organizational Theory and Management: The Philosophical Approach, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 487-507.
  • Zan, B. U. (2019). Doğrudan atıf, ortak atıf ve bibliyografik eşleşme yaklaşımlarına dayalı olarak araştırma alanlarının değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14 (2), 501-516.
  • Zhao, L., Deng, J., Sun, P., Liu, J., Ji, Y., Nakada, & Yang, Y. (2018). Nanomaterials for treating emerging contaminants in water by adsorption and photocatalysis: Systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 627, 1253-1263.
  • Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18 (3), 429-472.
Toplam 57 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular İşletme
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Yasemin Savaş 0000-0002-5089-1185

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Savaş, Y. (2023). Yönetim Alanında Fenomenoloji Kavramının Görsel Haritalama Tekniğiyle Bibliyometrik Analizi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(2), 472-490. https://doi.org/10.47097/piar.1270484

Pamukkale Üniversitesi İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisinde yayınlanmış makalelerin telif hakları Creative Commons Atıf-Gayriticari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) kapsamındadır.

by-nc-nd.png