Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Türkiye’de Dördüncü Balıkçı Gemisi Geri-Alım Programının Analizi

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 38 - 44, 03.07.2020

Vahdet Ünal Huriye Göncüoğlu

https://doi.org/10.46384/jmsf.739631
Cited By: 3

Öz

Bu çalışma, Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Balıkçılık ve Su Ürünleri Genel Müdürlüğü tarafından çıkarılan bir tebliğ ile uygulamaya geçirilen dördüncü balıkçı gemisi geri-alım programını değerlendirmektedir. Programda 22,4 milyon Turkish Lira karşılığında, toplam 213 balıkçı gemisi geri alınmıştır. Çalışmanın verileri, oransal örnek hacmi dikkate alınarak gemi sahiplerinin %24,4’üyle yapılan görüşmelerden elde edilmiştir. En fazla gemi alımı; Marmara (%39), en az gemi alımı da Ege bölgesinden (%12) yapılmıştır. Programa, 10,00 m-12,00 m arası 213 balıkçı gemisi başvurmuş ve bunların geri-alımı gerçekleşmiştir. Devredilen gemilerin tamamı küçük ölçekli balıkçı gemisi kategorisinde yer almaktadır. Bu gemilerin %30’u, yılda 120 günden az, %46’sı ise 120-239 gün arası avcılık yapmaktadır Yılda 240 günden fazla avcılık yaptığını bildiren balıkçıların oranı %24’tür. Balıkçı gemilerini devreden kişilerin %13’ü ikinci bir gemiye sahiptir. Programa katılan fakat gemisini verse de balıkçılıkta kalmaya devam edeceğini bildiren balıkçıların %78’si, geri-alım programından aldıkları destekleme ile yeni bir balıkçı gemisi alacağını bildirmiştir. Balıkçı gemilerinin %96’sı sezonluk veya sürekli mürettebat çalıştırmaktadır. Bu tayfaların %51’nin aile dışındaki kişilerden oluştuğu tespit edilmiştir. Bunlara ilave olarak, mürettebatın %46’sı balıkçılık sektöründe çalışmaya devam edeceğini açıklamıştır. Sonuç olarak, incelenen balıkçı gemisi geri-alım programının, balıkçı filosundan sayıca azaltma yapmak suretiyle; balıkçılıkta etkinliği arttırmak balık stokları üzerindeki baskıyı azaltmak ve sürdürülebilir balıkçılığı desteklemek gibi iddialı amaçları olduğu görülmektedir. Çalışmanın mevcut bulguları, programın amaçları doğrultusunda uzun dönemli olumlu etkiler ortaya çıkarmasının mümkün olmadığını göstermektedir. Bu nedenle, geri alım programlarının sonuç ve başarılarının detayları ile ilgili tüm değerlendirmeler otoriteler tarafından yapılmalı ve gelecekteki programlar gerekli düzeltmeler eşliğinde gerçekleştirilmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Balıkçılık Geri-Alımları Balıkçı Gemisi Hizmetten Alma Avcılık Kapasitesinin Azaltılması Filo Kapasitesinin Azaltılması Balıkçılık Yönetimi

Kaynakça

  • Bartley, D. M. (2019). From Sustainability to Catastrophe to Recovery: The Need for Using an Ecosystem Approach for Responsible Fishery Management. Pages: 567-571 in C.C. Krueger, W.W. Taylor, and S. Youn, editors. From Catastrophe to Recovery: Stories of Fishery Management Success. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Curtis, R., & Squires, D. (2007). Fisheries Buybacks. Iowa: Blackwell Publishing. Ltd. ISBN: 13: 978-0-8138-2546-5/2007, 267 p.
  • De Vaus, D. A. (1990). Surveys in Social Research. (2.bas›m). London: Unwin Hyman.
  • Ekmekci, B. & Ünal, V. (2019). Analysis of the second generation buy-back program for fishing vessels in Turkey. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 36(3), 229-243. DOI: 10.12714/egejfas.2019.36.3.04
  • Eurostat (2016). Data extracted in October 2016. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Fishery_statistics_in_detail&oldid=311673.
  • Grafton, R.Q. (2008). Canadian Fisheries Governance: The good, the bad and the ugly. (Edt., N. Schneider) A breath of fresh air: the state of environmental policy in Canada. Fraser Institute, ISBN: 978-0-88975-241-2, Canada.
  • Groves, T., & Squires. D. (2007). Lessons from Fisheries Buybacks. (Ed. R. Curtis and D. Squires) Fisheries Buybacks, 14–54. Iowa: Blackwell Publishing.
  • GTHB (2012). Resmi gazetenin 2012 tarihli ve 28328 sayısında yayımlanmış olan “Balıkçı Gemisini Avcılıktan Çıkaranlara Yapılacak Destekleme Tebliği” (2012/51).
  • Göktay, S., Göncüoğlu-Bodur, H. & Ünal, V. (2018). Analysis of the first buy-back program for fishing vessels in Turkey. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 35(4), 433-445. DOI:10.12714/egejfas.2018.35.4.09
  • Holland, D., Gudmundsson, E., & Gates., J. (1999). Do Fishing Vessel Buyback Programs Work: A Survey of the Evidence. Marine Policy 23: 47–69
  • Newbold, P. (1995). Statistics for Business and Economics, Prentice Hall Inc., USA. Pages 1016.
  • Teh, L.S.L., Hotte, N. & Sumaila, U.R. (2017). Having it all: can fisheries buybacks achieve capacity, economic, ecological, and social objectives? Maritime Studies, 16:1. DOI 10.1186/s40152-016-0055-z
  • Squires, D. (2010). Fisheries buybacks: a review and guidelines. Fish and Fisheries. 11, 366-387. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00365.x
  • STECF (2015). The 2015 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet. Scientific, Technical, and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF 15-07). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2015, EUR 27428 EN, ISBN 978-92-79-50642-0 doi:10.2788/307845
  • STECF (2016). The 2016 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet. Scientific, Technical, and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF 16-11). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2016, EUR 28375 EN, ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2788/842673
  • STECF (2017). The 2017 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet. Scientific, Technical, and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF 17-12). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017, EUR 28345 ISSN 1977-6578; 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/36154
  • STECF (2018). The 2018 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet. Scientific, Technical, and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF 18-07). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018, EUR 28359 ISSN 2467-0715/1831-9424 doi:10.2760/56158S
  • STECF (2019). The 2019 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet. Scientific, Technical, and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF 19-06). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2019, EUR 28359 EN, ISBN 978-92-76-09517-0, doi:10.2760/911768, JRC117567.
  • Ünal, V., Göncüoğlu, H. & Göktay, S. (2015). Türkiye'de Balıkçı Gemisi Geri Satın Alma Programının Değerlendirilmesi. Ege Üni. Bilimsel Araşt. Projeleri, 013/SÜF/014, 46 s
  • Ünal, V & Göncüoğlu-Bodur, H. (2020). Analysis of the third generation buy-back program for fishing vessels in Turkey. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37(3), 1-1. Retrieved from http://www.egejfas.org/tr/issue/52051/648158

Analysis of the Fourth Generation Buy-Back Program for Fishing Vessels in Turkey

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 38 - 44, 03.07.2020

Vahdet Ünal Huriye Göncüoğlu

https://doi.org/10.46384/jmsf.739631
Cited By: 3

Öz

In this study, the results of the fourth buy-back program in Turkey which entered into force by the “Notice of Agricultural Support-Official Notice of Decommissioning of Fishing Vessels”, issued by the Directorate of Fishery and Aquaculture of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, was evaluated. In the program, a total of 213 fishing vessels were taken back for a total of 22.4 million Turkish Lira. In this study, simple random sampling method was used to interview 24.4% of the fishing vessels owners. The highest number of buy-backs was in Marmara Region (39%), followed by the Aegean (12%) Region. A total of 213 fishing vessels ranging 10,00 m-12,00 m meters in length applied for the buy-back program which were all decommissioned. All of the buy-back vessels were in the small-scale category. Among those, 30% of the vessels were in use for less than 120 days/year and 46% were fishing between 120-239 days/year. Among those, 24% of the vessels were in use for more than 240 days/year. However, 13% of the owners who handed over their vessels also owned a second boat. Seventy eight percent of the fishers who participated in the program stated that they would remain in fishing even if they gave their vessels, and further indicated that they would buy a new vessel with the support they received from the program. 96% of the fishers employed a crew on-board and 51% of their crew were not family members. In addition, 46% of the crew announced that they would continue to work in the field of fishery. In conclusion; the fourth generation buy-back program had ambitious objectives such as reducing fishing effort, increasing efficiency in fishing, reducing pressure on fish stocks and supporting sustainable fishing. Current findings indicate that it is not possible to produce long-term positive effects. Therefore, all details of the results and the success of the buy-back programs should be evaluated by the authorities and future programs should be put into practice with necessary amendments.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fisheries buy-backs vessel decommissioning reducing fishing effort reducing fleet capacity fisheries management

Kaynakça

  • Bartley, D. M. (2019). From Sustainability to Catastrophe to Recovery: The Need for Using an Ecosystem Approach for Responsible Fishery Management. Pages: 567-571 in C.C. Krueger, W.W. Taylor, and S. Youn, editors. From Catastrophe to Recovery: Stories of Fishery Management Success. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Curtis, R., & Squires, D. (2007). Fisheries Buybacks. Iowa: Blackwell Publishing. Ltd. ISBN: 13: 978-0-8138-2546-5/2007, 267 p.
  • De Vaus, D. A. (1990). Surveys in Social Research. (2.bas›m). London: Unwin Hyman.
  • Ekmekci, B. & Ünal, V. (2019). Analysis of the second generation buy-back program for fishing vessels in Turkey. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 36(3), 229-243. DOI: 10.12714/egejfas.2019.36.3.04
  • Eurostat (2016). Data extracted in October 2016. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Fishery_statistics_in_detail&oldid=311673.
  • Grafton, R.Q. (2008). Canadian Fisheries Governance: The good, the bad and the ugly. (Edt., N. Schneider) A breath of fresh air: the state of environmental policy in Canada. Fraser Institute, ISBN: 978-0-88975-241-2, Canada.
  • Groves, T., & Squires. D. (2007). Lessons from Fisheries Buybacks. (Ed. R. Curtis and D. Squires) Fisheries Buybacks, 14–54. Iowa: Blackwell Publishing.
  • GTHB (2012). Resmi gazetenin 2012 tarihli ve 28328 sayısında yayımlanmış olan “Balıkçı Gemisini Avcılıktan Çıkaranlara Yapılacak Destekleme Tebliği” (2012/51).
  • Göktay, S., Göncüoğlu-Bodur, H. & Ünal, V. (2018). Analysis of the first buy-back program for fishing vessels in Turkey. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 35(4), 433-445. DOI:10.12714/egejfas.2018.35.4.09
  • Holland, D., Gudmundsson, E., & Gates., J. (1999). Do Fishing Vessel Buyback Programs Work: A Survey of the Evidence. Marine Policy 23: 47–69
  • Newbold, P. (1995). Statistics for Business and Economics, Prentice Hall Inc., USA. Pages 1016.
  • Teh, L.S.L., Hotte, N. & Sumaila, U.R. (2017). Having it all: can fisheries buybacks achieve capacity, economic, ecological, and social objectives? Maritime Studies, 16:1. DOI 10.1186/s40152-016-0055-z
  • Squires, D. (2010). Fisheries buybacks: a review and guidelines. Fish and Fisheries. 11, 366-387. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00365.x
  • STECF (2015). The 2015 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet. Scientific, Technical, and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF 15-07). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2015, EUR 27428 EN, ISBN 978-92-79-50642-0 doi:10.2788/307845
  • STECF (2016). The 2016 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet. Scientific, Technical, and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF 16-11). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2016, EUR 28375 EN, ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2788/842673
  • STECF (2017). The 2017 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet. Scientific, Technical, and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF 17-12). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017, EUR 28345 ISSN 1977-6578; 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/36154
  • STECF (2018). The 2018 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet. Scientific, Technical, and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF 18-07). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018, EUR 28359 ISSN 2467-0715/1831-9424 doi:10.2760/56158S
  • STECF (2019). The 2019 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet. Scientific, Technical, and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF 19-06). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2019, EUR 28359 EN, ISBN 978-92-76-09517-0, doi:10.2760/911768, JRC117567.
  • Ünal, V., Göncüoğlu, H. & Göktay, S. (2015). Türkiye'de Balıkçı Gemisi Geri Satın Alma Programının Değerlendirilmesi. Ege Üni. Bilimsel Araşt. Projeleri, 013/SÜF/014, 46 s
  • Ünal, V & Göncüoğlu-Bodur, H. (2020). Analysis of the third generation buy-back program for fishing vessels in Turkey. Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37(3), 1-1. Retrieved from http://www.egejfas.org/tr/issue/52051/648158
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Çevre Bilimleri
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Vahdet Ünal 0000-0001-6157-0590

Huriye Göncüoğlu 0000-0001-7068-037X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 3 Temmuz 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Mayıs 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Ünal, V., & Göncüoğlu, H. (2020). Türkiye’de Dördüncü Balıkçı Gemisi Geri-Alım Programının Analizi. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Journal of Marine Sciences and Fisheries, 3(1), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.46384/jmsf.739631

Cited By

The Rich Get Stronger: The Purse Seine Fishery of the Turkish Straits System
Fishes
https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7060301
Bio-economic indicators of fisheries: impact of variations in landings and fish size on market prices in Istanbul Fish Market
PeerJ
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15141
Techno-economic efficiencies of the purse-seiners in the Aegean Sea (Eastern Mediterranean, Turkey)
Ocean & Coastal Management
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105943
 Kapak Resmi İndir