Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2021, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 106 - 112, 15.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.35860/iarej.799055

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Özer, Ö. and S.B. Yuksel, Comparing Analysis Results Of Tall Buildings Which Takes Earthquake Effects By Reinforced Concrete Frames And Shear Walls Together According To Tbec 2018 And Tec 2007. Nigde Omer Halisdemir University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2020. 9: p. 931 - 945.
  • 2. Winkler, E., Die Lehre Von Elasticitaet Und Festigkeit. 1st Edn. H. Dominicus. 1867, Prague.
  • 3. Vallabhan, C.V.G. and A.T. Daloglu, Consistent FEM-Vlasov model for plates on layered soil. Journal of Structural Engineering-Asce, 1999. 125(1): p. 108-113.
  • 4. Vlasov, V.Z. and N.N. Leontiev, Beams, Plates And Shells Of Elastic Foundations. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1966.
  • 5. Girgin, S.C., et al., The Role Of Soil-Structure Interaction On Structural Design. Deu Faculty of Engineering Journal of Science and Engineering, 2008. 10(1): p. 27-37.
  • 6. Daloglu, A.T. and C.V.G. Vallabhan, Values of k for slab on Winkler foundation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2000. 126(5): p. 463-471.
  • 7. TEC, Turkish Earthquake Code. 2007, Ankara: Ministry of Public Works and Settlemen.
  • 8. Fatahi, B., S.H.R. Tabatabaiefar, and B. Samali, Soil-structure interaction vs Site effect for seismic design of tall buildings on soft soil. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2014. 6(3): p. 293-320.
  • 9. Tomeo, R., et al., SSI effects on seismic demand of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames. Engineering Structures, 2018. 173: p. 559-572.
  • 10. Moghaddasi, M., et al., Effects of soil-foundation-structure interaction on seismic structural response via robust Monte Carlo simulation. Engineering Structures, 2011. 33(4): p. 1338-1347.
  • 11. Celebi, E., F. Goktepe, and N. Karahan, Non-linear finite element analysis for prediction of seismic response of buildings considering soil-structure interaction. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2012. 12(11): p. 3495-3505.
  • 12. Özmen, B., 17 August 1999 Izmit Bay Earthquake Damage Status (With Numerical Data), in TDV/DR 010-53. 2000: Turkish Earthquake Foundation. p. 132.
  • 13. TBEC, Turkish Building Earthquake Code. Ministry of Interior Disaster and Emergency Management Authority. 2018, Ankara.
  • 14. Mısır, S.İ., G. Özden, and S. Kahraman, The Effects of Using Constant and Variable Subgrade Modulus on the Structural Behaviour. Sixth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2007: p. 217-228.
  • 15. SCIA, Foundations and Subsoil (manual). 2012, Nemetschek.
  • 16. Farghaly, A.A. and H.H. Ahmed, Contribution of soil-structure interaction to seismic response of buildings. Ksce Journal of Civil Engineering, 2013. 17(5): p. 959-971.
  • 17. Balkaya, C., S.B. Yuksel, and O. Derinoz, Soil-structure interaction effects on the fundamental periods of the shear-wall dominant buildings. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2012. 21(6): p. 416-430.
  • 18. Xiong, W., L.Z. Jiang, and Y.Z. Li, Influence of soil-structure interaction (structure-to-soil relative stiffness and mass ratio) on the fundamental period of buildings: experimental observation and analytical verification. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2016. 14(1): p. 139-160.

Comparison of the effect of foundation analysis methods on structural analysis results of tall buildings

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 106 - 112, 15.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.35860/iarej.799055

Öz

In structural analysis, there are serious interactions between soil-foundation and structure. The fixed base analysis method ignores this interaction but many analysis methods have been developed that take into account the soil-structure interaction (SSI). This paper revealed the effects of SSI analysis methods on tall buildings analysis results on soft soil sites. 6 different structural models with 20 story buildings and two different coefficients of subgrade reactions were analyzed with three different analysis methods which are fixed base method, Winkler method and pseudo-coupled method. As a result of all the analysis, 6 different structural models compared and discussed in terms of structural period, displacements, lateral loads, column, shear wall and foundation reactions and structural economy. It has been observed that the structure may remain on the unsafe side in the analysis made with the fixed base analysis method.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Özer, Ö. and S.B. Yuksel, Comparing Analysis Results Of Tall Buildings Which Takes Earthquake Effects By Reinforced Concrete Frames And Shear Walls Together According To Tbec 2018 And Tec 2007. Nigde Omer Halisdemir University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2020. 9: p. 931 - 945.
  • 2. Winkler, E., Die Lehre Von Elasticitaet Und Festigkeit. 1st Edn. H. Dominicus. 1867, Prague.
  • 3. Vallabhan, C.V.G. and A.T. Daloglu, Consistent FEM-Vlasov model for plates on layered soil. Journal of Structural Engineering-Asce, 1999. 125(1): p. 108-113.
  • 4. Vlasov, V.Z. and N.N. Leontiev, Beams, Plates And Shells Of Elastic Foundations. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1966.
  • 5. Girgin, S.C., et al., The Role Of Soil-Structure Interaction On Structural Design. Deu Faculty of Engineering Journal of Science and Engineering, 2008. 10(1): p. 27-37.
  • 6. Daloglu, A.T. and C.V.G. Vallabhan, Values of k for slab on Winkler foundation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2000. 126(5): p. 463-471.
  • 7. TEC, Turkish Earthquake Code. 2007, Ankara: Ministry of Public Works and Settlemen.
  • 8. Fatahi, B., S.H.R. Tabatabaiefar, and B. Samali, Soil-structure interaction vs Site effect for seismic design of tall buildings on soft soil. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2014. 6(3): p. 293-320.
  • 9. Tomeo, R., et al., SSI effects on seismic demand of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames. Engineering Structures, 2018. 173: p. 559-572.
  • 10. Moghaddasi, M., et al., Effects of soil-foundation-structure interaction on seismic structural response via robust Monte Carlo simulation. Engineering Structures, 2011. 33(4): p. 1338-1347.
  • 11. Celebi, E., F. Goktepe, and N. Karahan, Non-linear finite element analysis for prediction of seismic response of buildings considering soil-structure interaction. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2012. 12(11): p. 3495-3505.
  • 12. Özmen, B., 17 August 1999 Izmit Bay Earthquake Damage Status (With Numerical Data), in TDV/DR 010-53. 2000: Turkish Earthquake Foundation. p. 132.
  • 13. TBEC, Turkish Building Earthquake Code. Ministry of Interior Disaster and Emergency Management Authority. 2018, Ankara.
  • 14. Mısır, S.İ., G. Özden, and S. Kahraman, The Effects of Using Constant and Variable Subgrade Modulus on the Structural Behaviour. Sixth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2007: p. 217-228.
  • 15. SCIA, Foundations and Subsoil (manual). 2012, Nemetschek.
  • 16. Farghaly, A.A. and H.H. Ahmed, Contribution of soil-structure interaction to seismic response of buildings. Ksce Journal of Civil Engineering, 2013. 17(5): p. 959-971.
  • 17. Balkaya, C., S.B. Yuksel, and O. Derinoz, Soil-structure interaction effects on the fundamental periods of the shear-wall dominant buildings. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2012. 21(6): p. 416-430.
  • 18. Xiong, W., L.Z. Jiang, and Y.Z. Li, Influence of soil-structure interaction (structure-to-soil relative stiffness and mass ratio) on the fundamental period of buildings: experimental observation and analytical verification. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2016. 14(1): p. 139-160.
Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İnşaat Mühendisliği
Bölüm Research Articles
Yazarlar

Ömer Özer 0000-0002-5126-6832

Bahadır Yüksel 0000-0002-4175-1156

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Nisan 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 23 Eylül 2020
Kabul Tarihi 2 Ocak 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Özer, Ö., & Yüksel, B. (2021). Comparison of the effect of foundation analysis methods on structural analysis results of tall buildings. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, 5(1), 106-112. https://doi.org/10.35860/iarej.799055
AMA Özer Ö, Yüksel B. Comparison of the effect of foundation analysis methods on structural analysis results of tall buildings. Int. Adv. Res. Eng. J. Nisan 2021;5(1):106-112. doi:10.35860/iarej.799055
Chicago Özer, Ömer, ve Bahadır Yüksel. “Comparison of the Effect of Foundation Analysis Methods on Structural Analysis Results of Tall Buildings”. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal 5, sy. 1 (Nisan 2021): 106-12. https://doi.org/10.35860/iarej.799055.
EndNote Özer Ö, Yüksel B (01 Nisan 2021) Comparison of the effect of foundation analysis methods on structural analysis results of tall buildings. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal 5 1 106–112.
IEEE Ö. Özer ve B. Yüksel, “Comparison of the effect of foundation analysis methods on structural analysis results of tall buildings”, Int. Adv. Res. Eng. J., c. 5, sy. 1, ss. 106–112, 2021, doi: 10.35860/iarej.799055.
ISNAD Özer, Ömer - Yüksel, Bahadır. “Comparison of the Effect of Foundation Analysis Methods on Structural Analysis Results of Tall Buildings”. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal 5/1 (Nisan 2021), 106-112. https://doi.org/10.35860/iarej.799055.
JAMA Özer Ö, Yüksel B. Comparison of the effect of foundation analysis methods on structural analysis results of tall buildings. Int. Adv. Res. Eng. J. 2021;5:106–112.
MLA Özer, Ömer ve Bahadır Yüksel. “Comparison of the Effect of Foundation Analysis Methods on Structural Analysis Results of Tall Buildings”. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, c. 5, sy. 1, 2021, ss. 106-12, doi:10.35860/iarej.799055.
Vancouver Özer Ö, Yüksel B. Comparison of the effect of foundation analysis methods on structural analysis results of tall buildings. Int. Adv. Res. Eng. J. 2021;5(1):106-12.

Cited By

ANALYSIS OF RAFT FOUNDATION ON SANDY SOILS BY WINKLER AND PSEUDO-COUPLED METHODS
Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.31796/ogummf.1224081



Creative Commons License

Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.