Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Selection of Experimental Aquatic Animals, Advantages and Disadvantages

Year 2018, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 93 - 100, 30.09.2018

Utku Güner

https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.458599

Abstract

Nowadays, aquatic toxicity is an interesting research topic. The increasing number and variety

of aquatic test animals are used for experiment. This this review discusses the selection criteria of the different

aquatic experiments animals. Also in this paper, which shows important criteria in the selection of experimental

animals. And also selecting aquatic animals in aquatic experiments, which should be asked questions and shows the

advantages and disadvantages of aquatic experiments animals.

Keywords

Advantage aquatic animals criteria disadvantage experimental animals

References

  • Anonymous, 2014. Hayvan Deneyleri Etik Kurullarının Çalışma Usul ve Esaslarına Dair Yönetmelik. Resmi Gazete Sayı: 28914. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/02/20140215-6.htm (Erişim tarihi: 19 Şubat 2018)
  • Alim D, Matter H, 2015. Histopathological Alteration Induced in Gills of Juvenile Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus upon exposure to two Bio-pesticides. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 2(5): 80-83.
  • Atamanalp M, Bayır A, Sirkecioğlu AN, Cengiz M, 2003. Bir Dezenfektanın Malahit Yeşili Subletal Dozlarının Gökkuşağı Alabalığı Oncorhynchus mykiss Kan Parametreleri Üzerine Etkileri. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(3): 177-187.
  • Care IoLARCo, Animals UoL, Resources NIoHDoR, 1985. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academies. 246 p.
  • Cogun HY, Fırat Ö, Fırat Ö, Yüzereroǧlu TA, Gök G, Kargin F, Kötemen Y, 2012. Protective effect of Selenium Against Mercury‐induced Toxicity on Hematological and Biochemical Parameters of Oreochromis niloticus. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, 26(3):117-122.
  • Çoğun HY, Çapar SÖ, Çağlar R, Taşyürek K, Tanrıver B, Özdemir S, Er CB, Çimrin İ, Sarıçicek E, 2013. Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758)’da Dimethoat’ın Bazı Enzim Sistemlerine Toksik Etkileri. Anadolu Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2): 33-36.
  • Dağlıoğlu Y, Çelebi MS, Önalan Ş, 2016. Determination of Acute Toxic Effects of Poly (Vinylferrocenium) Supported Palladium Nanoparticle (Pd/PVF+) on Artemia salina. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 48(1):187-193.
  • De Boeck G, Meeus W, De Coen W, Blust R, 2004. Tissue-specific Cu Bioaccumulation Patterns and Differences in Sensitivity to Waterborne Cu in Three Freshwater Fish: Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio), and Gibel Carp (Carassius auratus gibelio). Aquatic Toxicology, 70(3): 179-188.
  • Erkeç ÖE, Arıhan O, 2014. Animal Models in Medical Studies. International Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2): 50-63.
  • Erkekoglu P, Giray BK, Başaran N, 2011. 3R Principle and Alternative Toxicity Testing Methods. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 36: 105-18.
  • Festing MF, Altman DG, 2002. Guidelines for the Design and Statistical Analysis of Experiments Using Laboratory Animals. ILAR Journal, 43(4): 244-258.
  • Fırat Ö, Cogun HY, Yüzereroğlu TA, Gök G, Fırat Ö, Kargin F, Kötemen Y, 2011. A Comparative Study on the Effects of a Pesticide (Cypermethrin) and Two Metals (Copper, Lead) to Serum Biochemistry of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 37(3): 657-666.
  • Gallo D, Merendino A, Keizer J, Vittozzi L,1995. Acute Toxicity of Two Carbamates to the Guppy (Poecilia reticulata) and the Zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio). Science of the Total Environment, 171(1): 131-136.
  • Griffitt RJ, Weil R, Hyndman KA, Denslow ND, Powers K, Taylor D, Barber DS, 2007. Exposure to Copper Nanoparticles Causes Gill Injury and Acute Lethality in Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environmental Science & Technology, 41(23): 8178-8186.
  • Güner U, 2012a. Alüminyumun, Farklı pH Değerlerinde Gambusia affinis (Baird & Girard, 1853) Üzerine Toksisitesi. V. Ulusal Limnoloji Sempozyumu, 1-4 Ağustos 2012, Süleymen Demirel Üniversitesi, Eğirdir-Isparta.
  • Güner U, 2012b. Determination of 24-and 48-hour LC50 Values of Diazinon in Gambusia affinis (baird & girard, 1853). Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 63(2): 32-33.
  • Güner U, 2009. Determination of Lambda-cyhalotrin (Tekvando 5EC) 96 Hour Lethal Concentration 50 at Gambusia affinis (Baird & Girard, 1853). Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, 3(3): 214-219.
  • Güner U, 2010. Heavy metal effects on P, Ca, Mg, and Total Protein Contents in Embryonic Pleopodal Eggs and Stage-1 Juveniles of Freshwater Crayfish Astacus leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823). Turkish Journal of Biology, 34(4): 405-412.
  • Johnson WW, Finley MT, 1980. Handbook of Acute Toxicity of Chemicals to Fish and Aquatic Invertebrates: Summaries of Toxicity Tests Conducted at Columbia National Fisheries Research Laboratory, 1965-78. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 98 p.
  • Kaya M, Çevik A, 2011. Planning in Animal Experiments and Choosing Model. Deneysel Tıp Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, l(2): 36-39.
  • Lavorgna M, Russo C, D'Abrosca B, Parrella A, Isidori M, 2016. Toxicity and Genotoxicity of the Quaternary Ammonium Compound Benzalkonium Chloride (BAC) Using Daphnia magna and Ceriodaphnia dubia as Model Systems. Environmental Pollution, 210: 34-39.
  • Narges AB, Ahmad S, Mohammadsedigh M, Hossein Z, Negin S, Zohreh AB, 2012. Non-essential Metals (Cd & Pb) Accumulation And Elimination in Liver Tissue of Juvenile Milkfish, After Sublethal Exposure. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences, 41(5): 412-417.
  • Rand GM, 1995. Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology: Effects, Environmental Fate and Risk Assessment. CRC Press. 1148 p.
  • Rand M, Greenberg AE, Taras MJ, 1976. Standard Methods for The Examination of Water and Wastewater. Prepared and Published Jointly by American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation. 541 p.
  • Sevilla JB, Nakajima F, Yamamoto K, 2013. Effect Of Food And Light on The Sensitivity of Copper And Zinc to Freshwater Benthic Ostracod Heterocypris incongruens. Journal of Water and Environment Technology, 11(3): 249-261.
  • Türe M, Haliloğlu Hİ, Altuntaş C, Boran H, Kutlu İ, 2014. Comparison of Experimental Susceptibility of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), Turbot (Psetta maxima), Black Sea Trout (Salmo trutta labrax) and Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) to Lactococcus garvieae. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 14: 507-513.

Sucul Deney Hayvanları Seçilmesi, Avantajlar ve Dezavantajlar

Year 2018, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 93 - 100, 30.09.2018

Utku Güner

https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.458599

Abstract

Günümüzde akuatik toksikoloji ilgi çeken bir araştırma konusudur. Artan sayıda ve çeşitte sucul
hayvan deney amacıyla kullanılmaktadır. Bu derlemede farklı sucul deney hayvanlarının seçilme ölçütleri
ortaya konulmaktadır. Ayrıca farklı deney hayvanı seçiminde hangi kriterlerin önemli olduğu, hangi sucul deney
hayvanının nasıl seçileceğini göstermektedir. Bunun yanında sucul deney hayvanları seçilmesinde hangi soruların
sorulması gerektiği, farklı sucul hayvanların birbirlerine göre avantaj ve dezavantajları verilmektedir.

Keywords

Avantaj deney hayvanları dezavantaj kriter sucul deney hayvanları

References

  • Anonymous, 2014. Hayvan Deneyleri Etik Kurullarının Çalışma Usul ve Esaslarına Dair Yönetmelik. Resmi Gazete Sayı: 28914. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/02/20140215-6.htm (Erişim tarihi: 19 Şubat 2018)
  • Alim D, Matter H, 2015. Histopathological Alteration Induced in Gills of Juvenile Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus upon exposure to two Bio-pesticides. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 2(5): 80-83.
  • Atamanalp M, Bayır A, Sirkecioğlu AN, Cengiz M, 2003. Bir Dezenfektanın Malahit Yeşili Subletal Dozlarının Gökkuşağı Alabalığı Oncorhynchus mykiss Kan Parametreleri Üzerine Etkileri. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(3): 177-187.
  • Care IoLARCo, Animals UoL, Resources NIoHDoR, 1985. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academies. 246 p.
  • Cogun HY, Fırat Ö, Fırat Ö, Yüzereroǧlu TA, Gök G, Kargin F, Kötemen Y, 2012. Protective effect of Selenium Against Mercury‐induced Toxicity on Hematological and Biochemical Parameters of Oreochromis niloticus. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, 26(3):117-122.
  • Çoğun HY, Çapar SÖ, Çağlar R, Taşyürek K, Tanrıver B, Özdemir S, Er CB, Çimrin İ, Sarıçicek E, 2013. Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758)’da Dimethoat’ın Bazı Enzim Sistemlerine Toksik Etkileri. Anadolu Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2): 33-36.
  • Dağlıoğlu Y, Çelebi MS, Önalan Ş, 2016. Determination of Acute Toxic Effects of Poly (Vinylferrocenium) Supported Palladium Nanoparticle (Pd/PVF+) on Artemia salina. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 48(1):187-193.
  • De Boeck G, Meeus W, De Coen W, Blust R, 2004. Tissue-specific Cu Bioaccumulation Patterns and Differences in Sensitivity to Waterborne Cu in Three Freshwater Fish: Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio), and Gibel Carp (Carassius auratus gibelio). Aquatic Toxicology, 70(3): 179-188.
  • Erkeç ÖE, Arıhan O, 2014. Animal Models in Medical Studies. International Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2): 50-63.
  • Erkekoglu P, Giray BK, Başaran N, 2011. 3R Principle and Alternative Toxicity Testing Methods. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 36: 105-18.
  • Festing MF, Altman DG, 2002. Guidelines for the Design and Statistical Analysis of Experiments Using Laboratory Animals. ILAR Journal, 43(4): 244-258.
  • Fırat Ö, Cogun HY, Yüzereroğlu TA, Gök G, Fırat Ö, Kargin F, Kötemen Y, 2011. A Comparative Study on the Effects of a Pesticide (Cypermethrin) and Two Metals (Copper, Lead) to Serum Biochemistry of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 37(3): 657-666.
  • Gallo D, Merendino A, Keizer J, Vittozzi L,1995. Acute Toxicity of Two Carbamates to the Guppy (Poecilia reticulata) and the Zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio). Science of the Total Environment, 171(1): 131-136.
  • Griffitt RJ, Weil R, Hyndman KA, Denslow ND, Powers K, Taylor D, Barber DS, 2007. Exposure to Copper Nanoparticles Causes Gill Injury and Acute Lethality in Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environmental Science & Technology, 41(23): 8178-8186.
  • Güner U, 2012a. Alüminyumun, Farklı pH Değerlerinde Gambusia affinis (Baird & Girard, 1853) Üzerine Toksisitesi. V. Ulusal Limnoloji Sempozyumu, 1-4 Ağustos 2012, Süleymen Demirel Üniversitesi, Eğirdir-Isparta.
  • Güner U, 2012b. Determination of 24-and 48-hour LC50 Values of Diazinon in Gambusia affinis (baird & girard, 1853). Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 63(2): 32-33.
  • Güner U, 2009. Determination of Lambda-cyhalotrin (Tekvando 5EC) 96 Hour Lethal Concentration 50 at Gambusia affinis (Baird & Girard, 1853). Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, 3(3): 214-219.
  • Güner U, 2010. Heavy metal effects on P, Ca, Mg, and Total Protein Contents in Embryonic Pleopodal Eggs and Stage-1 Juveniles of Freshwater Crayfish Astacus leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823). Turkish Journal of Biology, 34(4): 405-412.
  • Johnson WW, Finley MT, 1980. Handbook of Acute Toxicity of Chemicals to Fish and Aquatic Invertebrates: Summaries of Toxicity Tests Conducted at Columbia National Fisheries Research Laboratory, 1965-78. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 98 p.
  • Kaya M, Çevik A, 2011. Planning in Animal Experiments and Choosing Model. Deneysel Tıp Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, l(2): 36-39.
  • Lavorgna M, Russo C, D'Abrosca B, Parrella A, Isidori M, 2016. Toxicity and Genotoxicity of the Quaternary Ammonium Compound Benzalkonium Chloride (BAC) Using Daphnia magna and Ceriodaphnia dubia as Model Systems. Environmental Pollution, 210: 34-39.
  • Narges AB, Ahmad S, Mohammadsedigh M, Hossein Z, Negin S, Zohreh AB, 2012. Non-essential Metals (Cd & Pb) Accumulation And Elimination in Liver Tissue of Juvenile Milkfish, After Sublethal Exposure. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences, 41(5): 412-417.
  • Rand GM, 1995. Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology: Effects, Environmental Fate and Risk Assessment. CRC Press. 1148 p.
  • Rand M, Greenberg AE, Taras MJ, 1976. Standard Methods for The Examination of Water and Wastewater. Prepared and Published Jointly by American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation. 541 p.
  • Sevilla JB, Nakajima F, Yamamoto K, 2013. Effect Of Food And Light on The Sensitivity of Copper And Zinc to Freshwater Benthic Ostracod Heterocypris incongruens. Journal of Water and Environment Technology, 11(3): 249-261.
  • Türe M, Haliloğlu Hİ, Altuntaş C, Boran H, Kutlu İ, 2014. Comparison of Experimental Susceptibility of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), Turbot (Psetta maxima), Black Sea Trout (Salmo trutta labrax) and Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) to Lactococcus garvieae. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 14: 507-513.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Structural Biology
Journal Section Biyoloji / Biology
Authors

Utku Güner 0000-0003-4135-2486

Publication Date September 30, 2018
Submission Date January 15, 2018
Acceptance Date February 22, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 8 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Güner, U. (2018). Sucul Deney Hayvanları Seçilmesi, Avantajlar ve Dezavantajlar. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 8(3), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.458599
AMA Güner U. Sucul Deney Hayvanları Seçilmesi, Avantajlar ve Dezavantajlar. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. September 2018;8(3):93-100. doi:10.21597/jist.458599
Chicago Güner, Utku. “Sucul Deney Hayvanları Seçilmesi, Avantajlar Ve Dezavantajlar”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 8, no. 3 (September 2018): 93-100. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.458599.
EndNote Güner U (September 1, 2018) Sucul Deney Hayvanları Seçilmesi, Avantajlar ve Dezavantajlar. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 8 3 93–100.
IEEE U. Güner, “Sucul Deney Hayvanları Seçilmesi, Avantajlar ve Dezavantajlar”, J. Inst. Sci. and Tech., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 93–100, 2018, doi: 10.21597/jist.458599.
ISNAD Güner, Utku. “Sucul Deney Hayvanları Seçilmesi, Avantajlar Ve Dezavantajlar”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 8/3 (September 2018), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.458599.
JAMA Güner U. Sucul Deney Hayvanları Seçilmesi, Avantajlar ve Dezavantajlar. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2018;8:93–100.
MLA Güner, Utku. “Sucul Deney Hayvanları Seçilmesi, Avantajlar Ve Dezavantajlar”. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 3, 2018, pp. 93-100, doi:10.21597/jist.458599.
Vancouver Güner U. Sucul Deney Hayvanları Seçilmesi, Avantajlar ve Dezavantajlar. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2018;8(3):93-100.