Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Rekreasyonel Motivasyonların Belirlenmesi: Spor Tesisi Örneği

Year 2006, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 15 - 23, 01.12.2006

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, kullanıcıların rekreasyonel motivasyonlarını belirlemek ve bu motivasyon faktörlerinin kullanıcı özelliklerine göre nasıl değişim gösterdiğini tespit etmek amacıyla Ankara Anıttepe Spor Tesisleri’nde 200 katılımcıya anket uygulanmıştır. Değerlendirme sonucunda, yedi adet motivasyonel faktör grubu tespit edilmiştir. Yapılan analizlere göre, rekreasyonel motivasyonlar katılımcının cinsiyeti, yaşı, çalışma durumu ve aktivitenin gerçekleştirildiği alanın özelliklerine göre değişim gösterdiği saptanmıştır.

References

  • Annett, S., C. Dabrowski, R.A. Robertson, 1995. Motivations and constraints to spring break travel: A cross gender. Proceedings of the 1995 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. New York. 217-221.
  • Carroll, B., Alexandris, K., 1997. Perception of constraints and strength of motivation: Their relationship to recreation sport participation in Greece. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(3), 279-299.
  • Confer, J.J., Vogelsong, A.R., Graefe, D.S., Solan and J., Kramp, 1996. Relationship between motivations and recreation activity preference among Delaware State Park visitors: an exploratory analysis. Proceedings of the 1996 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. New York. 146-153
  • Driver, B.L., Brown, P.J., 1975. A sociopsychological definition of recreation demand, with implications for recreation resource planning. In Assessing demand for outdoor recreation. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
  • Ewert, A., Hollenhorst, S., 1989. Testing the adventure model: Empirical support for a model of risk recreation participation. Journal of Leisure Research. 21: 124-139.
  • Ewert, A., 1993. Differences in the level of motive importance based on trip outcome, experience level and group type. Journal of Leisure Research. 25: 335- 349:
  • Graefe, A.R., Thapa, B., Confer, J.J., Absher, J.D., 1999 Relationships between trip motivations and selected variables among Allegheny National Forest Visitors. Widerness Science in a Time of Change Conference, Montana. Volum 4, 107-112
  • Hendee, J.C., Stankey, G.H., Lucas, R.C., 1990. Wilderness management. Golden CO: North American Press.
  • Jackson, E.L., Wong, R.A.G., 1982. Perceived conflict between urban cross-country skiers and snowmobilers in Alberta. Journal of Leisure Research, 14(1), 47-62.
  • Kinnaird, V., D. Hall, 1994. Tourism: A gender analysis. Chichester, England: John Willey and Sons.
  • Müderrisoğlu, H., Kutay, E.L., Örnekçi Eşen, S.,2005. Kırsal rekreasyonel faaliyetlerde kısıtlayıcılar. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. 11(1), 40-44.
  • Özdamar, K., 1999. Paket Programlar ile İstatiksel Veriler Analizi. Kaan Kitapevi, Eskişehir. Cilt 1, 535 pp.
  • Pearce, D.G., 1993. Comparative studies in tourism research. İn D.G. Pearce, R.W. Butler (Eds.), Tourism research: Critiques and challenges. pp 20-35. London: Routledge.
  • Rosenthal, D.H., Driver, B.L., Waltman, D., 1982. Construct validity of instruments measuring recreationists’ preferences. Leisure sciences. 5: 89-108.
  • Schuett, M.A., 1994. Environmental preference and risk recreation: The case of white water kayakers. Journal of Environmental Education. 25: 9-14.
  • Todd, S.L., Graefe, A.R., Mann, W., 2001. Differences in scuba diver motivations based on level of development. Proceedings of the 2001 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. New York. 107-117
  • Vogelsong, H., A.R. Graefe, J.J. Confer, D.S. Solan, J.K. Kramp, 1997. Relationships between motivations and recreation activity preferences among Delaware State Park visitors an exploratory analysis. Proceedings of the 1997 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. New York. pp : 124-127.
  • White, E., Gray, L.P., 2001 Skier motivations: do they change over time?. Proceedings of the 2001 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. New York. 115-117.
  • Young, R., 1993. Towards an understanding of wilderness participation. Leisure sciences, 5, pp: 339-357.
Year 2006, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 15 - 23, 01.12.2006

Abstract

References

  • Annett, S., C. Dabrowski, R.A. Robertson, 1995. Motivations and constraints to spring break travel: A cross gender. Proceedings of the 1995 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. New York. 217-221.
  • Carroll, B., Alexandris, K., 1997. Perception of constraints and strength of motivation: Their relationship to recreation sport participation in Greece. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(3), 279-299.
  • Confer, J.J., Vogelsong, A.R., Graefe, D.S., Solan and J., Kramp, 1996. Relationship between motivations and recreation activity preference among Delaware State Park visitors: an exploratory analysis. Proceedings of the 1996 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. New York. 146-153
  • Driver, B.L., Brown, P.J., 1975. A sociopsychological definition of recreation demand, with implications for recreation resource planning. In Assessing demand for outdoor recreation. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
  • Ewert, A., Hollenhorst, S., 1989. Testing the adventure model: Empirical support for a model of risk recreation participation. Journal of Leisure Research. 21: 124-139.
  • Ewert, A., 1993. Differences in the level of motive importance based on trip outcome, experience level and group type. Journal of Leisure Research. 25: 335- 349:
  • Graefe, A.R., Thapa, B., Confer, J.J., Absher, J.D., 1999 Relationships between trip motivations and selected variables among Allegheny National Forest Visitors. Widerness Science in a Time of Change Conference, Montana. Volum 4, 107-112
  • Hendee, J.C., Stankey, G.H., Lucas, R.C., 1990. Wilderness management. Golden CO: North American Press.
  • Jackson, E.L., Wong, R.A.G., 1982. Perceived conflict between urban cross-country skiers and snowmobilers in Alberta. Journal of Leisure Research, 14(1), 47-62.
  • Kinnaird, V., D. Hall, 1994. Tourism: A gender analysis. Chichester, England: John Willey and Sons.
  • Müderrisoğlu, H., Kutay, E.L., Örnekçi Eşen, S.,2005. Kırsal rekreasyonel faaliyetlerde kısıtlayıcılar. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. 11(1), 40-44.
  • Özdamar, K., 1999. Paket Programlar ile İstatiksel Veriler Analizi. Kaan Kitapevi, Eskişehir. Cilt 1, 535 pp.
  • Pearce, D.G., 1993. Comparative studies in tourism research. İn D.G. Pearce, R.W. Butler (Eds.), Tourism research: Critiques and challenges. pp 20-35. London: Routledge.
  • Rosenthal, D.H., Driver, B.L., Waltman, D., 1982. Construct validity of instruments measuring recreationists’ preferences. Leisure sciences. 5: 89-108.
  • Schuett, M.A., 1994. Environmental preference and risk recreation: The case of white water kayakers. Journal of Environmental Education. 25: 9-14.
  • Todd, S.L., Graefe, A.R., Mann, W., 2001. Differences in scuba diver motivations based on level of development. Proceedings of the 2001 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. New York. 107-117
  • Vogelsong, H., A.R. Graefe, J.J. Confer, D.S. Solan, J.K. Kramp, 1997. Relationships between motivations and recreation activity preferences among Delaware State Park visitors an exploratory analysis. Proceedings of the 1997 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. New York. pp : 124-127.
  • White, E., Gray, L.P., 2001 Skier motivations: do they change over time?. Proceedings of the 2001 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. New York. 115-117.
  • Young, R., 1993. Towards an understanding of wilderness participation. Leisure sciences, 5, pp: 339-357.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section İç Anadolu’da Ağaçlandırma Çalışmaları
Authors

Haldun Müderrisoğlu

Hüseyin Samet Aşıkkutlu This is me

Ayşe Kalaycı This is me

Burcu Salantur This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2006
Published in Issue Year 2006 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Müderrisoğlu, H., Samet Aşıkkutlu, H., Kalaycı, A., Salantur, B. (2006). Rekreasyonel Motivasyonların Belirlenmesi: Spor Tesisi Örneği. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 2(2), 15-23.

........