Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Elektromanyetik Kirlilik Seviyesinin Belirlenmesi: Ankara Örneği

Year 2018, Volume:6 No:3 (2018) (Special Issue: UMAS 2017), 650 - 659, 10.04.2018

Çetin Kurnaz Tülay Aygün

Abstract

Teknolojinin gelişmesine paralel
olarak kablosuz iletişim sistemlerini kullanım her geçen gün artmaktadır.
Kablosuz sistemler içerisinde önemli bir yeri olan hücresel sistemlerin ve
dolayısıyla Baz istasyonların sayısı da yükselmektedir. Artan Baz
istasyonlarından kaynaklı elektromanyetik radyasyon (EMR) seviyelerinin
ölçülmesi, değerlendirilmesi ve olası tedbirlerin önceden alınması insan
sağlığı açısından elzemdir. Bu nedenle, bu çalışmada Ankara ilinin Yenimahalle
ilçesinde iki farklı günde ve 100 farklı konumda EMR ölçümleri PMM-8053 EMR
ölçüm cihazı kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Ölçümlerde en yüksek elektrik alan
şiddeti (Emax) 7.84 V/m, en yüksek ortalama elektrik alan şiddeti (Eavg)
ise 2.61 V/m olarak belirlenmiştir. Ölçüm yerlerinin %90’ında Eavg değeri
1 V/m’den daha düşüktür. Her ne kadar ölçülen E değerleri ICNIRP ve BTK
tarafından belirlenen limitlerin altında olsa da; maruz kalınan E seviyelerinin
halk sağlığını tehdit etmeyecek seviyelerde tutulması açısından düzenli
aralıklarla ölçülmesi ve izlenmesi önerilir.

Keywords

Elektromanyetik radyasyon Elektromanyetik dalga Elektrik alan şiddeti Baz istasyonu PMM 8053

References

  • [1] ICNIRP Guidelines, “Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300GHz),” International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, Health Physics, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 494-522, 1998.
  • [2] BTK, “Elektronik Haberleşme Cihazlarindan Kaynaklanan Elektromanyetik Alan Şiddetinin Uluslararası Standartlara Göre Maruziyet Limit Değerlerinin Belirlenmesi, Kontrolü ve Denetimi Hakkında Yönetmelikte Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Yönetmelik,” 9 Ekim 2015 tarihli Resmi Gazete, sayı no.29497.
  • [3] B. K. Engiz, Ç. Kurnaz, “Long-Term Electromagnetic Field Measurement and Assessment for a Shopping Mall,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol.175, no.3, pp.321-329, 2017.
  • [4] Ç. Kurnaz, “An Empirical Modeling of Electromagnetic Pollution on a University Campus,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Express Journal, vol.1, no.2, pp.76-79, 2016.
  • [5] Ç. Kurnaz, B. K. Engiz, “Measurement and Evaluation of Electric Field Strength in Samsun City Center,“ International Journal of Applied Mathematics, Electronics and Computer, vol.4, special issue-1,pp.24-29, 2016.
  • [6] Ç. Kurnaz, B.K. Engiz, M.C. Bozkurt, “Measurement and Evaluation of Electric Field Strength Levels in Primary and Secondary Schools in a Pilot Region,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx275
  • [7] Ç. Kurnaz, B. K. Engiz, M. C. Bozkurt, “Monitoring of RF/Microwave Field Strength at Schools in a Pilot District in Samsun/Turkey,” 16th Mediterranean Microwave Symposium (MMS2016)”, 14-16 November 2016, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
  • [8] T. Karadağ, M. Yüceer, T. Abbasov, “Large-Scale Measurement, Analysis and Modelling of Electromagnetic Radiation Levels in the Vicinity of GSM/UMTS Base Stations in an Urban Area,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 168(1), 134-147, 2015.
  • [9] L. Seyfi, “Measurement of electromagnetic radiation with respect to the hours and days of a week at 100kHz–3GHz frequency band in a Turkish dwelling,” Measurement, 46(9), pp.3002-3009, 2013.
  • [10] M. Koprivica, V. Slavkovic, N. Neskovic, A. Neskovic, “Statistical Analysis Of Electromagnetic Radiation Measurements in the Vicinity of GSM/UMTS Base Station Installed On Buildings in Serbia,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, pp.1-14, 2015.
  • [11] S. Miclaus, P. Bechet, “Estimated and Measured values of the Radiofrequency Radiation Power Density around Cellular Base Stations,” Environment Physics, vol. 52, no. 3–4, pp. 429–440, 2007.
  • [12] P. Baltrenas, R., Buckus R., “Measurements and analysis of the electromagnetic fields of mobile communication antennas,” Measurement, vol.46, no.10, pp.3942-3949, 2013.
  • [13] http://www.pmm.eu/includes/sendfile.asp?nomep=Field_Probes

Determination of Electromagnetic Pollution Level: Ankara Example

Year 2018, Volume:6 No:3 (2018) (Special Issue: UMAS 2017), 650 - 659, 10.04.2018

Çetin Kurnaz Tülay Aygün

Abstract

In parallel with the development of technology, the usage of wireless communication systems is increasing day by day. The number of cellular systems and thus base stations, which have a significant percentage in wireless systems, is also increasing. Measuring, evaluating, and taking precautionary measures of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) levels originating from increased base stations is essential for human health. For this reason, in this study EMR measurements were conducted using PMM-8053 EMR meter in Yenimahalle district of Ankara in two different days and at 100 different locations. The highest electric field strength (Emax) was determined as 7.84 V/m and the highest average field strength (Eavg) as 2.61 V/m. The Eavg value is less than 1 V/m at 90% of measurement locations. Although the measured E values are below the limits defined by ICNIRP and ICTA, it is recommended that the exposed E levels be measured and monitored at regular intervals in terms of keeping them at levels that do not cause adverse effect on public health.

Keywords

Electromagnetic radiation Electromagnetic wave electric field strength Base station PMM-8053

References

  • [1] ICNIRP Guidelines, “Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300GHz),” International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, Health Physics, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 494-522, 1998.
  • [2] BTK, “Elektronik Haberleşme Cihazlarindan Kaynaklanan Elektromanyetik Alan Şiddetinin Uluslararası Standartlara Göre Maruziyet Limit Değerlerinin Belirlenmesi, Kontrolü ve Denetimi Hakkında Yönetmelikte Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Yönetmelik,” 9 Ekim 2015 tarihli Resmi Gazete, sayı no.29497.
  • [3] B. K. Engiz, Ç. Kurnaz, “Long-Term Electromagnetic Field Measurement and Assessment for a Shopping Mall,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol.175, no.3, pp.321-329, 2017.
  • [4] Ç. Kurnaz, “An Empirical Modeling of Electromagnetic Pollution on a University Campus,” Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Express Journal, vol.1, no.2, pp.76-79, 2016.
  • [5] Ç. Kurnaz, B. K. Engiz, “Measurement and Evaluation of Electric Field Strength in Samsun City Center,“ International Journal of Applied Mathematics, Electronics and Computer, vol.4, special issue-1,pp.24-29, 2016.
  • [6] Ç. Kurnaz, B.K. Engiz, M.C. Bozkurt, “Measurement and Evaluation of Electric Field Strength Levels in Primary and Secondary Schools in a Pilot Region,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx275
  • [7] Ç. Kurnaz, B. K. Engiz, M. C. Bozkurt, “Monitoring of RF/Microwave Field Strength at Schools in a Pilot District in Samsun/Turkey,” 16th Mediterranean Microwave Symposium (MMS2016)”, 14-16 November 2016, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
  • [8] T. Karadağ, M. Yüceer, T. Abbasov, “Large-Scale Measurement, Analysis and Modelling of Electromagnetic Radiation Levels in the Vicinity of GSM/UMTS Base Stations in an Urban Area,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 168(1), 134-147, 2015.
  • [9] L. Seyfi, “Measurement of electromagnetic radiation with respect to the hours and days of a week at 100kHz–3GHz frequency band in a Turkish dwelling,” Measurement, 46(9), pp.3002-3009, 2013.
  • [10] M. Koprivica, V. Slavkovic, N. Neskovic, A. Neskovic, “Statistical Analysis Of Electromagnetic Radiation Measurements in the Vicinity of GSM/UMTS Base Station Installed On Buildings in Serbia,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, pp.1-14, 2015.
  • [11] S. Miclaus, P. Bechet, “Estimated and Measured values of the Radiofrequency Radiation Power Density around Cellular Base Stations,” Environment Physics, vol. 52, no. 3–4, pp. 429–440, 2007.
  • [12] P. Baltrenas, R., Buckus R., “Measurements and analysis of the electromagnetic fields of mobile communication antennas,” Measurement, vol.46, no.10, pp.3942-3949, 2013.
  • [13] http://www.pmm.eu/includes/sendfile.asp?nomep=Field_Probes
There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Çetin Kurnaz

Tülay Aygün This is me

Publication Date April 10, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume:6 No:3 (2018) (Special Issue: UMAS 2017)

Cite

APA Kurnaz, Ç., & Aygün, T. (2018). Elektromanyetik Kirlilik Seviyesinin Belirlenmesi: Ankara Örneği. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 6(3), 650-659.
AMA Kurnaz Ç, Aygün T. Elektromanyetik Kirlilik Seviyesinin Belirlenmesi: Ankara Örneği. DUBİTED. April 2018;6(3):650-659.
Chicago Kurnaz, Çetin, and Tülay Aygün. “Elektromanyetik Kirlilik Seviyesinin Belirlenmesi: Ankara Örneği”. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi 6, no. 3 (April 2018): 650-59.
EndNote Kurnaz Ç, Aygün T (April 1, 2018) Elektromanyetik Kirlilik Seviyesinin Belirlenmesi: Ankara Örneği. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 6 3 650–659.
IEEE Ç. Kurnaz and T. Aygün, “Elektromanyetik Kirlilik Seviyesinin Belirlenmesi: Ankara Örneği”, DUBİTED, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 650–659, 2018.
ISNAD Kurnaz, Çetin - Aygün, Tülay. “Elektromanyetik Kirlilik Seviyesinin Belirlenmesi: Ankara Örneği”. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 6/3 (April 2018), 650-659.
JAMA Kurnaz Ç, Aygün T. Elektromanyetik Kirlilik Seviyesinin Belirlenmesi: Ankara Örneği. DUBİTED. 2018;6:650–659.
MLA Kurnaz, Çetin and Tülay Aygün. “Elektromanyetik Kirlilik Seviyesinin Belirlenmesi: Ankara Örneği”. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 3, 2018, pp. 650-9.
Vancouver Kurnaz Ç, Aygün T. Elektromanyetik Kirlilik Seviyesinin Belirlenmesi: Ankara Örneği. DUBİTED. 2018;6(3):650-9.